Attorney Meirav Abady, Head of Regulatory Affairs, responds to the government’s submission to the High Court of Justice by detailing the shortcomings of the proposed regulations.
Since 2022, Adam Teva V’Din has been engaged in a pivotal case at the High Court of Justice, petitioning the Ministry of Environmental Protection to adopt a framework for reducing PFAS in our environment. Abady points out: “The Ministry’s responses have been inadequate, perpetuating delays and regulatory gaps. We have detailed the shortcomings in court, emphasizing that Israel’s regulatory approach lags far behind international standards.”
In Adam Teva V’Din’s opinion, the Ministry’s draft conditions for poison permits prioritize business flexibility over environmental protection. For instance, businesses are allowed up to a year for assessments and 18 months to submit emissions management plans. These timelines are unacceptably long. Furthermore, the vague language and discretionary nature of the conditions undermine accountability.
While other nations have implemented stringent regulations to restrict and phase out PFAS chemicals, the Ministry of Environmental Protection has dragged its feet for over five years, says Abady.
“Adam Teva V’Din is pushing for regulations that restrict PFAS use immediately, mandate frequent testing and a clear schedule for phase-out of these harmful substances. We look forward to our next day in court.”
